Strange decisions that are hard to justify

The Canadian is already a quarter of the way through his 2023-2024 season. Montreal has played 19 games and collected 18 points, which puts them under .500.

And again, with the extra point distribution after 60 minutes, I like to remember that playing .500 in the NHL equates to putting up around 88-89 points in 82 games, not 82 in 82 like in the good old days of void judgment. But I digress…

Last night in Anaheim, the Canadian won his first match in regular time after a month, and the drought coincided with the injury of David Savard and his withdrawal from the lineup. 19 games played and already two streaks of four defeats in a row. I’m not offended by these two streaks at all, losing streaks are the prerogative of bad teams… not young talented teams, but in learning they avoid long losing streaks because the club’s raw talent allows them to win one game a week in general. Losing streaks are the stuff of bad teams. Are the Canadiens a bad team? I’ll spare myself some discomfort at least until the offseason…

But one thing is certain, the Canadian is not a good team, which I say without fear of being wrong. Is our collective assessment of a team’s players biased? Are we blinded by alienation, so we no longer see everything and romanticize too much?

There’s probably a little bit of that. But at the same time, I find hockey decisions by organizations that have a direct connection to the action on the ice to be risky, to say the least. The menage a trois in front of the net is a mess. Starting the season with three goalkeepers, fine, but to see all three still sharing two nets in training and one net in games a quarter of the way through the season is ridiculous.

I don’t know who advises young Primeau, but if it were me, I’d show up every other day with a good cup of coffee in Kent Hughes’ office. The treatment the Canadian reserved for Primeau makes no sense at the moment.

What is the logic?

As for the composition of the trio, it is also completely incomprehensible. What is the logic behind the strategy of dividing the talent among the four attacking units? Martin Saint-Louis looks like a “kid” who wants to spread jam on the whole sandwich bread, but only has a small crust left, and worse…

I still don’t understand why we don’t draft a true top 6 based on merit and talent, too bad for the third and fourth lines. Sean Monahan accepted the big bet proposed by Kent Hughes this summer…a one-year deal with a 70% pay cut. Despite an excellent start to the season, despite the recovered health that has held up for now, despite being the only player in the entire organization to have already accumulated at least 80 points in a season, Monahan has been pushed into the middle of the third division. trio. Why?

I’ll spare you the “x’s” and “o’s” on the board, but many good hockey minds we’ve consulted really don’t understand why the Canadian persists and bogs down in a defensive concept that makes all his opponents drool.

Carey Price recently confided that he misses “the game” and would like to play again… He is not sure that when he looks at the Canadian’s mistakes in the series of awards in his territory, that Carey still has a taste for “goal”. ..

The Canadian is currently lagging behind last season’s production. It’s not so terrible, management and coaches don’t want to hear about it anymore, they don’t look at the ranking. What they want is to see their players progress individually. Apart from Juraj Slafkovski, Kaiden Guhle and a few others, but very few, does the management think that all players are progressing individually? I cannot answer this question in the affirmative. and you

Source link

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *